The much-discussed Harper’s open letter opposing cancel culture has provoked, you guessed it, another open letter. This one accuses the original of being elite and racist, but many Twitter users aren’t buying the argument.

The writers of the fresh missive attacked the letter, which appeared on the website of Harper’s Magazine earlier this week, under six sub-headings, including ‘Editors are fired for running controversial pieces?’ and ‘A researcher fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study?’. 

Also on

JK Rowling at Lincoln Center in New York; Noam Chomsky at the National Autonomous University's Educational Investigation Institute in Mexico City ©  REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/Jorge Dan
Chomsky, Rowling & others sign open letter against cancel culture, get blasted by left & right for lame, limp stance

They laid out who they believed the original letter writers were referring to and made their case as to why they were wrong, despite not actually knowing who the original writers were referring to.   

The original letter’s failure to mention the wave of anti-police protests in the United States is blasted as “at best obtuse and at worst actively racist”. A significant chunk of the new letter is also devoted to trans issues, accusing several of the Harper’s signees of being anti-trans, despite the original letter not mentioning trans issues.

The new letter appears to have gone down like a cup of cold sick, with many taking to Twitter to roast its content and writers. Prominent conservative commenter Ben Shapiro dismissed it as an “idiotic take,” but did note that it was useful for revealing who will be “operating the cancel culture guillotines.”

The Harper’s letter was signed by dozens of high-profile names from the worlds of academia, literature and media, including Noam Chomsky, JK Rowling and Malcolm Gladwell.

The signees of the riposte released on Friday have a significantly lower profile. Indeed, 23 of the “signatories” didn’t actually sign the letter, instead choosing to note only their place of work or the industry they worked in.

The letter explained: “Many signatories on our list noted their institutional affiliation but not their name, fearful of professional retaliation. It is a sad fact, and in part why we wrote the letter.” This prompted many to note the irony of claiming that cancel culture doesn’t exist while also deciding to remain anonymous.

Amid the swirl of social media reaction, jokes from jilted journalists who were never asked to sign either of the letters became notably overworked while many also noted that it was past time for everyone to move on.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Source: RT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *